Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A national mixed-method survey study.

BACKGROUND: It is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision-making, communication, or participation in the context of MDT meetings specifically. METHODS: This was a mixed method, prospective cross-sectional survey study taking place in the United Kingdom between September 2020 and August 2021. RESULTS: The participants were 423 MDT members. Qualitative findings revealed hybrid working and possibility of virtual attendance as the change introduced because of COVID-19 that MDTs would like to maintain. However, IT-related issues, slower meetings, longer lists and delays were identified as common with improving of the IT infrastructure necessary going forward. In contrast, virtual meetings and increased attendance/availability of clinicians were highlighted as the positive outcomes resulting from the change. Quantitative findings showed significant improvement from before COVID-19 for MDT meeting organisation and logistics (M = 45, SD = 20) compared to the access (M = 50, SD = 12, t(390) = 5.028, p = 0.001), case discussions (M = 50, SD = 14, t(373) = -5.104, p = 0.001), and patient representation (M = 50, SD = 12, t(382) = -4.537, p = 0.001) at MDT meetings. DISCUSSION: Our study explored the perception of change since COVID-19 among cancer MDTs using mixed methods. While hybrid working was preferred, challenges exist. Significant improvements in the meeting organisation and logistics were reported. Although we found no significant perceived worsening across the four domains investigated, there was an indication in this direction for the case discussions warranting further 'live' assessments of MDT meetings.

ADXBladder molecular urine testing to risk stratify and prioritise management of suspected and known bladder cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective:COVID-19 has challenged diagnostic and surveillance pathways for suspected and known bladder transitional cell cancer (TCC). Exclusion of high-grade/invasive TCC by molecular urine testing could risk stratify patients for priority flexible cystoscopy and transurethral resection (TUR). We evaluated ADXBladder (ArquerDx), which has a high negative predictive value (NPV) for high-grade and ? pT1 TCC.Patients and methods:Prospective cohort study of patients referred with haematuria for diagnostics or on TCC surveillance (Dec 2020?Feb 2021). Patients underwent ADXBladder testing, flexible cystoscopy and imaging (for haematuria), followed by TUR/biopsy as necessary. Clinico-radiological/pathology findings were compared with ADXBladder results.Results:Of 117 eligible patients, 39 and 78 had positive and negative ADXBladder tests, respectively. Of 15 suspected TCC on cystoscopy, eight were confirmed on TUR/biopsy. Overall ADXBladder NPV was 96.2% (CI: 91.0?98.4). NPV for high-grade and ?pT1 TCC was 97.4% (CI: 94.4?98.8) and 98.7% (CI: 95.0?99.7), respectively.Conclusions:Our ?real world? evaluation confirmed a high NPV for high grade and ?pT1 TCC using ADXBladder. Further larger studies are required to determine whether a negative ADXBladder test combined with negative imaging and patient risk factors may justify patient downgrading on timed diagnostic pathways.Level of evidence:IV

Hybrid urology conferences: using innovation and new approaches

Medical conferences evolved into virtual meetings in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic. While the virtual format has advantages, many prospective attendees look forward to a time when some face‐to‐face interaction will be possible again. The question is how to make such hybrid events successful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Trends in Urology & Men's Health is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)